Hiram College

Diversity Through Debate
Taught by Frank Hemphill and Roger Cram

Summer 2016 Lakeland Community College
Blended Course - 50% in Class, 50% on Line
May 20, 2016 to July 8, 2016

Room 112

IN CLASS - 6PM to 10 PM - May 20, June 3, June 17, July 1, 2016
AT HOME - May 27, June 10, June 24, July 8, 2016

Frank Hemphill
Director of Student Academic Services Retired - Adjunct Faculty
Hinsdale Hall
(C) 330-760-5668
hemphillfj@hiram.edu

Roger F. Cram
Hiram College Administrator Retired - Adjunct Faculty
6732 Bancroft St  P.O. Box 642 Hiram, Ohio 44234-0642

(H) 330-569-7962,  (C) 330-569-4912, Text (330-569-4912)
cramrf@hiram.edu

Interdisciplinary 38100-R01

Click here for extra credit
Click here for brain teasers

Crash PowerPoint     Prisoner Privatization Concerns
A War For Your Soul    National Geographic Project

Note: All writing assignments are to be printed, contain not less than 750 words unless otherwise indicated, stapled together if in paper format, the pages numbered, with your name on each page, include the date, the name of the class, and the name of the writing assignment or test. This is also true if the professor request papers emailed. Make sure the document contains this requested information, not just the subject box of the email.

Example:
Roger Cram
Diversity Through Debate
May 27, 2016
Writing Assignment #1 - What is my Ethnicity. Page 1

********************************************************************

This class is a team taught interdisciplinary. That means two professors will teach the class and each will present the
material from a different discipline. Different assignments will be presented to each professor as follows:

Roger Cram - Submit in class all the take-home quizzes, the Debate Winner Opinion Papers if utilized, and all extra credit assignments to Roger Cram.

Frank Hemphill - Submit the writing assignments including the final exam through email to hemphillfj@hiram.edu.

Course Description

What is debate? A debate is a contest, or, perhaps, like a game, where two or more speakers present their arguments intent on persuading one another. Since the beginning of time, men have been debating with one another. It can be argued that the first debate occurred when the serpent first debated with Eve the benefits of eating certain fruit in the Garden.  In this course we will explore a wide range of diversity issues that pertain specifically to race and ethnicity.   Participants will learn the techniques of debate and will explore the power and effectiveness of debate as a means of thoroughly examining and addressing issues of diversity.

Why debate?: "He [the student debater] learns to use a library, and to find the exact information he needs in the shortest possible time. He learns to be thorough and accurate. He learns to analyze; to distinguish between the vital and the unimportant. He learns the need of proving his statements; of supporting every statement with valid evidence and sound reasoning—and he learns to demand the same sort of proof for the statements of others. He learns to present ideas in a clear and effective manner, and in a way which wins others to his way of thinking. He learns to think under pressure, to "use his head" in a time of need, to make decisions quickly and accurately.  In a word, the essential point in any debating situation is that of convincing the listener that your side of the proposition is desirable" (from How to Debate by Harrison Boyd Summers).

Course Objectives:  To introduce students to the use of debate as a means of exploring race and ethnicity from both a sociological and psychological perspective. 

Required Reading Materials (text books):

 Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Controversial Issues in Race and Ethnicity (9th or 10th Edition, Paperback)  by Raymond D'Angelo (Author), Herbert Douglas (Author).

American Ethnicity: The Dynamics and Consequences of Discrimination (6th or 7th Edition, Paperback) by Adalberto Aguirre, Jr. (Author), Jonathan H. Turner (Author).

(Note: Supplemental reading assignments may be provided by the instructors).              

Teaching Methods

The instructional methods used for this course will be both didactic and experiential in nature. More specifically, in addition to structured debates, there will be discussion sections, open classroom discussions, videos, class exercises, class speakers, presentations, and lectures. Particular emphasis will be placed on creating an open and safe learning environment in which a diversity of views are both valued and appreciated.

Course Material Covered: 

At the beginning of each class, a tentative schedule of activities will be provided.  However, depending upon the progress of the class, the calendar, schedule and discussion topic may change.

Grading:

Coursework will be weighted as follows:

              20%  Four (4) papers and other written assignments - 20%  being 5% each (Minimum 750 words for each paper, double spaced, printed)
  20%  Two (2) Chapter Quizzes - 20% (10% each quiz)
  15%  (Attendance - 10% , Class participation 5%)
  30%  There will be six (6) debates in this class. Each student will participate in three (3) of these debates. Individual grades will be based on contributing to class discussions, active team/group
          nvolvement, debate presentations, and demonstration of proper mastery of oral and written work. - 30% (10% per student per three debates.)
  15%  Final Exam
100%
 
Your debate team is depending on your participation with their assigned debates. Each person's grade depends on your involvement. Failure to communicate with fellow teammates between classes about your assigned progress and not showing up for class without ample notice to your teammates creates stress for your team. Be considerate of other members of your debate team.

Both instructors are very invested in your success in the course. Thus, if at any time you need clarification, assistance, or additional guidance, please feel free to contact us.  We are here for you.

 *The instructors retain the right to change or modify any aspect of this syllabus.  In the event that changes or updates are made, students will be notified in a timely manner.

Syllabus - 8-Week Blended Class - Four-hour Classes  6:00 pm to 10:00 pm


IN CLASS
Session One - May 20, 2016
- Diversity involving the prejudice and discrimination of culture.
Introduction to class

Distribute and discuss the Rules for Debating, tolerating opposing points-of-view going over the class website.
Establish debating groups, determine group names, assign individual numbers, elect group captains
Discuss politically correct terms for various races
Discuss Chapter 1 in American Ethnicity-Ethnicity and Ethnic Relations
See the Movie The Color of Fear

Discuss The Color of Fear  and human alternative realities
Frank Hemphill: Class Experiment #1: Setting Boundaries

WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE FOR THE JUNE 3 IN CLASS MEETING?

A. Writing assignment number 1. Write a 500-word paper describing your ethnicity as you currently understand it. Submit by email to Frank Hemphill at hemphillfj@hiram.edu by June 2.

B. Contact your debating team and read and prepare for the following debates to be presented in class on June 3:
J
une 3 -Debate 1
: Group 2 (YES) and Group 1 (NO): Issue 13 in Edition 9, Issue 4.1 in Edition 10: in Taking Sides - Does Immigration Contribute to a Better America?
June 3 -Debate 2: Group  1 (YES) and Group 2 (NO):  Issue 3 in Edition 9, Issue 4.2 in Edition 10: in Taking Sides - Do Recent Immigration Trends Challenge Existing Ideas of America's White Identity?

C. See thge movie "Crash." Writing assignment number 2 - on the Movie Crash - On the last page of chapter one in American Ethnicity there are Key Terms for Chapter One. Pick five (5) of these terms and describe how they were depicted in the film Crash. Submit by email to Frank Hemphill at hemphillfj@hiram.edu by June 2.

D. Read Chapters 2 and 3 in American Ethnicity - be prepared to discuss in class on June 3, 2016.

E. See the film "A War For Your Soul" located on a link at the top of this web page. Be prepared to discuss this in classs on June 3, 2016.

 

AT HOME
Session Two - May 21 through June 2, 2016
- Diversity involving the prejudice and discrimination of ethnicity.

A. Writing assignment number 1. Write a 500-word paper describing your ethnicity as you currently understand it. Submit by email to Frank Hemphill at hemphillfj@hiram.edu by June 2.

B. Contact your debating team and read and prepare for the following debates to be presented in class on June 3:
J
une 3 -Debate 1
: Group 2 (YES) and Group 1 (NO): Issue 13 in Edition 9, Issue 4.1 in Edition 10: in Taking Sides - Does Immigration Contribute to a Better America?
June 3 -Debate 2: Group  1 (YES) and Group 2 (NO):  Issue 3 in Edition 9, Issue 4.2 in Edition 10: in Taking Sides - Do Recent Immigration Trends Challenge Existing Ideas of America's White Identity?

C. See thge movie "Crash." Writing assignment number 2 - on the Movie Crash - On the last page of chapter one in American Ethnicity there are Key Terms for Chapter One. Pick five (5) of these terms and describe how they were depicted in the film Crash. Submit by email to Frank Hemphill at hemphillfj@hiram.edu by June 2.

D. Read Chapters 2 and 3 in American Ethnicity - be prepared to discuss in class on June 3, 2016.

E. See the film "A War For Your Soul" located on a link at the top of this web page. Be prepared to discuss this in classs on June 3, 2016.

IN CLASS
SESSION THREE  - June 3, 2016 - Diversity involving the prejudice and discrimination of immigration policies and criminal exploitation.
A. Class discussion on the film "A War For Your Soul."
B.
Class discussion on writing assignmeent 2 on the Movie Crash.
C. See the PowerPoint on Crash. "People see what they are looking for."
D. Discuss Chapters 2 and 3 in American Ethnicity

Pizza Party provided by professors

E. HAVE THE FOLLOWING DEBATES:
June 3 -Debate 1: Group 2 (YES) and Group 1 (NO): Issue 13 in Edition 9, Issue 4.1 in Edition 10: in Taking Sides - Does Immigration Contribute to a Better America?
June 3 -Debate 2: Group  1 (YES) and Group 2 (NO):  Issue 3 in Edition 9, Issue 4.2 in Edition 10: in Taking Sides - Do Recent Immigration Trends Challenge Existing Ideas of America's White Identity?

F. View Movie Emmanuel's Gift (A remarkable and eye-opening film about laws, cultures, and society in Ghana)

G. PowerPoint:
Stigma of Mental Illness by Roger Cram. Mental illness, affecting one in four adults, provides opportunity for another form of prejudice and discrimination as does gender, race, the handicap, and different religions.

H. Submit writing assignment number 2 about the movie Crash. Submit by email to Frank Hemphill at hemphillfj@hiram.edu

I. Assign take-home quiz 1 on American Ethnicity - Chapters 1-2-3. Submit printed and stapled to Roger Cram in class on June 17, 2016.

WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE FOR THE JUNE 17 IN CLASS MEETING?
A. Complete Test 1, print it, and hand it in typed and stapled during IN CLASS SESSION on June 17.

B.
DEBATES: Contact your debating team and read and prepare for the following debates to be presented in class on June 17.
June 17
- Debate 3: Group 2 (YES) and 1 (NO): Issue 1 in Edition 9, Issue 1.1 in Edition 10: in Taking Sides - Do We Need a Common Identity?

June 17 - Debate 4: Group 1 (NO) and Group 2 (YES): Issue 8 in Edition 9, Issue 2.4 in Edition 10: Are Native American Mascots Racist Symbols?

D. Study
Prisoner Privatization Concerns at the top of this web page. Prepare for a discussion in the next class on June 17.

E. Read the Chapter in American Ethnicity-African Americans. (The chapter number on African Americans varies with your text addition). Be prepared to discuss it in the next class on June 17.

F. Take-home quiz #2 Read the article  A Painful Look at Colonization located on this web page. (SEE THE ARTICLE BELOW THIS SYLLABUS)  This essay involves the colonization history of the United States and the resulting prejudices and discrimination. READ THIS CAREFULLY!  Then integrate many of the key points in  A Painful Look at Colonization into your test #2 which is an essay. Write a paper addressing the following topics: Because immigration history is repeating itself in this country, do you think it would be beneficial for politicians to have some knowledge of colonization history before taking office? Why or why not? President Obama used his executive privilege to pass an Executive Order on immigration because Republicans have refused to vote on a similar bill. A link to an article and video is below. Do you feel this Executive Order will change some of the repeated prejudices presented in "A Painful Look at Colonization."? How will it change them?  Why will it change them?  Both questions together must not total less than 750 words combined.
http://www.bing.com/news/search?q=Obama's+Immigration+Executive+Order&qpvt=Obama%27s+immigration+executive+order&FORM=NWRFSH  Submit by email to Frank Hemphill at hemphillfj@hiram.edu by June 16, 2016.

G. Writing Assignment 3 - Emmanuel's Gift - What was Emmanuel's Gift? How do the national laws and customs of Ghana compete with individual tribal laws and customs created by tribal chiefs?  Name several prejudices connected with the disabled in Ghana. What was Emmanuel trying to do for the disabled?  Why would Emmanual shine shoes for $2.00 per day when he could get $10.00 per day from begging? Submit by email to Frank Hemphill at hemphillfj@hiram.edu by June 16, 2016.

AT HOME
Session Four - June 4 through June 16, 2016
- Diversity involving the prejudice and discrimination of African Americans and colonization.

A. Complete Test 1, print it, and hand it in typed and stapled during IN CLASS SESSION on June 17.

B.
DEBATES: Contact your debating team and read and prepare for the following debates to be presented in class on June 17.
June 17
- Debate 3: Group 2 (YES) and 1 (NO): Issue 1 in Edition 9, Issue 1.1 in Edition 10: in Taking Sides - Do We Need a Common Identity?

June 17 - Debate 4: Group 1 (NO) and Group 2 (YES): Issue 8 in Edition 9, Issue 2.4 in Edition 10: Are Native American Mascots Racist Symbols?

C
. Study
Prisoner Privatization Concerns at the top of this web page. Prepare for a discussion in the next class on June 17.

D. Read the Chapter in American Ethnicity-African Americans. (The chapter number on African Americans varies with your text addition). Be prepared to discuss it in the next class on June 17.

E. Take-Home Test 2 - Read the article  A Painful Look at Colonization located on this web page. (SEE THE ARTICLE BELOW THIS SYLLABUS) This essay involves the colonization history of the United States and the resulting prejudices and discrimination. READ THIS CAREFULLY!  Then integrate many of the key points in  A Painful Look at Colonization into your test #2 which is an essay. Write a paper addressing the following topics: Because immigration history is repeating itself in this country, do you think it would be beneficial for politicians to have some knowledge of colonization history before taking office? Why or why not? President Obama used his executive privilege to pass an Executive Order on immigration because Republicans have refused to vote on a similar bill. A link to an article and video is below. Do you feel this Executive Order will change some of the repeated prejudices presented in "A Painful Look at Colonization."? How will it change them?  Why will it change them?  Both questions together must not total less than 750 words combined.
http://www.bing.com/news/search?q=Obama's+Immigration+Executive+Order&qpvt=Obama%27s+immigration+executive+order&FORM=NWRFSH  Submit by email to Frank Hemphill at hemphillfj@hiram.edu by June 16, 2016.

F. Writing Assignment Number 3 - Emmanuel's Gift - EMMANUEL'S GIFT WILL BE VIEWED IN CLASS ON JUNE 17. THE WRITING ASSIGNMENT NUMBER 3 WILL BE DUE BY ON OR BEFORE JULY 1, 2016. What was Emmanuel's Gift? How do the national laws and customs of Ghana compete with individual tribal laws and customs created by tribal chiefs?  Name several prejudices connected with the disabled in Ghana. What was Emmanuel trying to do for the disabled?  Why would Emmanual shine shoes for $2.00 per day when he could get $10.00 per day from begging?  Submit by email to Frank Hemphill at hemphillfj@hiram.edu by June 16, 2016.


IN CLASS
Session Five - June 17, 2016
- Diversity involving the prejudice and discrimination of Native Americans and the handicapped.

A. Discuss the chapter in American Ethnicity - African Americans.

B. See the film "Half the Sky" in preparation for our guest lecturer. This begins our discussion on prejudice and discrimination against women.

C. Collect take-home quiz number 2.  Submit printed to Roger Cram in class.
 

D. DEBATES:
June 17
- Debate 3: Group 2 (YES) and 1 (NO): Issue 1 in Edition 9, Issue 1.1 in Edition 10: in Taking Sides - Do We Need a Common Identity?

June 17 - Debate 4: Group 1 (NO) and Group 2 (YES): Issue 8 in Edition 9, Issue 2.4 in Edition 10: Are Native American Mascots Racist Symbols?

E. The video/lecture: We Shall Remain: Wounded Knee
View this film between June 18 and June 30. Submit your Writing ASssignment #4 by June 30. Be prepared to discuss the film on July 1.
We Shall Remain at Wounded Knee Part 1

We Shall Remain at Wounded Knee Part 11
We Shall Remain at Wounded Knee Part III
We Shall Remain at Wounded Knee Part IV
We Shall Remain at Wounded Knee Part V
We Shall Remain at Wounded Knee Part VI
We Shall Remain at Wounded Knee Part VII

WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE FOR THE JULY 1 IN-CLASS MEETING?
A. The video: We Shall Remain: Wounded Knee. Writing assignment number 4:
American Ethnicity, Chapter 6 – We Shall Remain: Wounded Knee” - The Chinese, Hungarian, Italians, Irish, blacks, and other ethnicities have all, somewhat, assimilated into the American Anglo-Saxon culture while hanging on to portions of their heritage, history, and customs.  Our Native Americans, however, are in danger of having their culture and languages almost completely wiped out other than being able to buy a rubber tomahawk in a cheap tourist souvenir shop. How did this happen? Submit by email to Frank Hemphill at hemphillfj@hiram.edu by June 30, 2016.

B. DEBATES: Contact your debating team and read and prepare for the following debates to be presented in class on July 1, 2016
July 1 - Debate 5: Group 2 (NO) and Group 1 (YES):  Issue 16 in Edition 9, Issue 4.4 in Edition 10: Should Children of Undocumented Immigrants Have a Birthright to U.S. Citizenship?
July 1 - Debate 6: Group 1 (NO) and Group 2(YES):  Issue 9 in Edition 9, Issue 3.1 in Edition 10: Is Race Prejudice a Product of Group Position?

C. American Ethnicity, read Chapter Six - Native Americans

D. Speaker: John Kirubi from Engoshura, Kenya. John will be speaking about the culture of Kenya, its prejudices among the 42 tribes, its 42 languages, and the power of tribal kings over the national government. Prepare for guest lecturer next class by studying the links below. Please prepare two question for our speaker (per student) taken from the two below links.

http://sweetness-light.com/archive/kenyan-election-riot-deaths-reach-250
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2008-01-02-kenya-au-visit_N.htm

E. Writing assignment number 4:
American Ethnicity, Chapter 6 – We Shall Remain: Wounded Knee” - The Chinese, Hungarian, Italians, Irish, blacks, and other ethnicities have all, somewhat, assimilated into the American Anglo-Saxon culture while hanging on to portions of their heritage, history, and customs.  Our Native Americans, however, are in danger of having their culture and languages almost completely wiped out other than being able to buy a rubber tomahawk in a cheap tourist souvenir shop. How did this happen?


AT HOME
Session Six - June 18 through June 30, 2016
- Diversity involving the prejudice and discrimination women and the mentally ill.


Submit Writing Assignment Number 4 -
We Shall Remain: Wounded Knee.
Submit by email to
Frank Hemphill at hemphillfj@hiram.edu by June 30, 2016

Class discussion on Chapter Six - Native Americans

B. DEBATES: Contact your debating team and read and prepare for the following debates to be presented in class on July 1, 2016
July 1 - Debate 5: Group 2 (NO) and Group 1 (YES):  Issue 16 in Edition 9, Issue 4.4 in Edition 10: Should Children of Undocumented Immigrants Have a Birthright to U.S. Citizenship?
July 1 - Debate 6: Group 1 (NO) and Group 2(YES):  Issue 9 in Edition 9, Issue 3.1 in Edition 10: Is Race Prejudice a Product of Group Position?


F.
Prepare for guest lecturer next class by studying the links under the next class below. Please prepare two question for our speaker (per student) taken from these referenced links below.

http://sweetness-light.com/archive/kenyan-election-riot-deaths-reach-250
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2008-01-02-kenya-au-visit_N.htm

G. Take-home final exam issued – Submit by email to Frank Hemphill at hemphillfj@hiram.edu by July 8, 2016


IN CLASS
Week Seven - July 1, 2016
Diversity involving the prejudice and discrimination of African governments vs. tribal chief communities.

A. Hors d'oeuvres party provided by students

B. 
Diversity Through Debate: Celebration Pot-Luck Dinner & Program.
LOCATION = Classroom: Reception and welcome: 6:00 pm, Hors d'oeuvres party: 6:30 pm, Presentation starts at 7:00 pm, Program ends at 8:00 pm.
Speaker: John Kirubi from Engoshura, Kenya. John will be speaking about the culture of Kenya, its prejudices among the 42 tribes, its 42 languages, and the power of tribal kings over the national government.
Prepare for guest lecturer next class by studying the links below. Please prepare two question for our speaker (per student) taken from the two below links.

C. DEBATES:
Starts at 8:15 pm - July 1 - Debate 5: Group 2 (NO) and Group 1 (YES):  Issue 16 in Edition 9, Issue 4.4 in Edition 10: Should Children of Undocumented Immigrants Have a Birthright to U.S. Citizenship?
July 1 - Debate 6: Group 1 (NO) and Group 2(YES):  Issue 9 in Edition 9, Issue 3.1 in Edition 10: Is Race Prejudice a Product of Group Position?

http://sweetness-light.com/archive/kenyan-election-riot-deaths-reach-250
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2008-01-02-kenya-au-visit_N.htm

D. Discuss the film "Half the Sky" involving female diversity and discrimination.

E. Guest lecturer Professor Carol Donley to speak on "Half the Sky."

F. Cram lecture: Instinct vs. Ethnicity & Discrimination

 

AT HOME
Session Eight - July 2 through July 8, 2016

A. Complete the final exam. Submit by email to Frank Hemphill at hemphillfj@hiram.edu by July 8, 2016

 

Summary Class Assignments

WRITING ASSIGNMENTS:
Writing Assignment #1 - What is your ethnicity - due by June 2 - email to
hemphillfj@hiram.edu.
Writing Assignment #2 - The Movie Crash - due by June 2 - email to hemphillfj@hiram.edu.
Writing Assignment #3 - Emmanual's Gift due June 16 - email to hemphillfj@hiram.edu.
Writing Assignment #4 - We Shall Remain at Wounded Knee - email to
hemphillfj@hiram.edu.

DEBATES:
June 3 -Debate 1: Group 2 (YES) and Group 1 (NO): Issue 13 in Edition 9, Issue 4.1 in Edition 10: in Taking Sides - Does Immigration Contribute to a Better America?
June 3 -Debate 2: Group  1 (YES) and Group 2 (NO):  Issue 3 in Edition 9, Issue 4.2 in Edition 10: in Taking Sides - Do Recent Immigration Trends Challenge Existing Ideas of America's White Identity?
June 17 - Debate 3: Group 2 (YES) and 1 (NO): Issue 1 in Edition 9, Issue 1.1 in Edition 10: in Taking Sides - Do We Need a Common Identity?

June 17 - Debate 4: Group 1 (NO) and Group 2 (YES): Issue 8 in Edition 9, Issue 2.4 in Edition 10: Are Native American Mascots Racist Symbols?
July 1 - Debate 5: Group 2 (NO) and Group 1 (YES):  Issue 16 in Edition 9, Issue 4.4 in Edition 10: Should Children of Undocumented Immigrants Have a Birthright to U.S. Citizenship?
July 1 - Debate 6: Group 1 (NO) and Group 2(YES):  Issue 9 in Edition 9, Issue 3.1 in Edition 10: Is Race Prejudice a Product of Group Position?

TESTS / QUIZES
Test One - Due June 3 -
turn in printed and stapled to Roger Cram in class

Test Two - Due June 17- turn in printed and stapled to Roger Cram in class
Final Exam - Issued July 1, due July 8, email to Frank Hemphill hemphillfj@hiram.edu

 

Take-home final exam issued see below - email to Frank Hemphill hemphillfj@hiram.edu by December 20th.

 

Hiram College
Diversity through Debate
Part of Test Two
 

A Painful Look at Colonization
by Roger F. Cram

     Colonization is when a more powerful group of people dominate by force a less powerful group of people. It is usually not a nice thing, despite the original 13 colonies of United States being founded by our courageous founding fathers.   
     There are two types of colonization.  Let’s look at how they played a role in the history of United States.  Remember, we are looking at human behavior, not that of any political or cultural entity.
     External colonization occurs when a more powerful group of people colonizes a less powerful group by forcing their way into the new territory and gradually taking control of the political and economic activities of the weaker group. Gradually the dominate group alters or destroys the weaker group’s culture and their social organizations as well as having dominate representatives present for maintaining this control. In order to justify this aggressive behavior, the dominant group creates prejudicial stereotype beliefs about the weaker group (“Mexicans are unable to govern themselves…”) and often creates laws or policies restricting the dominated group’s abilities to advance (Jim Crow laws in the United States, and the segregation of schools helping assure blacks get a poor education, all blacks must leave the city of Cape Town, South Africa.).
     Internal colonization can occur after the above dominant group has established themselves and controls the new territory and its people. By controlling the social, political, educational, and economic activities of a less-powerful group within the new colony, the dominant group maintains power and protects their assets needed for survival. By controlling the ability for the weaker group to become educated, to obtain good employment, to elevate socially, and to gain political control, the dominant group assures it will remain on top with little competition.
     The dominant group needs cheap labor to harvest its crops and manufacture its products so large profits can be realized. Therefore, it would be in the best interest of the dominant group to keep the weaker group uneducated, unable to run for political office, unable to elect their representatives into managerial positions, and unable to socially gain community status. That’s easy to do! Blacks cannot vote. Women cannot vote. Native Americans cannot vote. Blacks, Italians, and Jews cannot join our country club. “Now hiring, Italians need not apply!” Keep the blacks poor and uneducated and they will be a source of cheap labor to harvest our cotton. If the Nicaraguan government can keep the peasants poor and uneducated, they will remain a source of cheap labor to harvest our sugarcane. The former South African Apartheid government kept the indigenous population poor and uneducated so they could be used as cheap labor for harvesting coffee and working in diamond and gold mines. Although our Declaration of Independence states that “…all men are created equal,” by classifying blacks as property or “chattel,” they lost their rights and remained slaves. Homosexuals may not join our church, “God hates them.”
     If any subgroup threatens our security, resources, or economy, first we will instinctually challenge or insult (President Bush says “Saddam Hussein is a danger to the world!”), then negotiate or barter (reveal your hidden weapons of mass destruction and we will not invade your country), and if unsuccessful, we will instinctually display our aggression and dominance by attacking: Vietnam (1965) and Iraq-oil (1991), Congo-rubber and ivory (1900-1905), blacks slaves classified as sub-human to insure our labor supply (1776), United States attacks Iraq (2003).
     If any other tribe controls the land or resources we need for our survival, identity, or expanding population, first we will instinctually challenge and insult (“Mexicans are unable to govern themselves.”), then barter (negotiate), and if unsuccessful, display our aggression and dominance by attacking so we can possess and steal to gain control of their resources: Mexican-American War (1846), Cherokee Indian “Trail of Tears,” (1838).  
     If any other tribe threatens our customs, religion, or way of life, humans respond the same as they do when their land is threatened: Protestant/Catholic disputes in Ireland, Palestine and Israel, prohibition against alcohol (1919), Franco of Spain bombing his country’s town of Guernica for being too democratic (1937), Adolph Hitler kills millions of Jews trying to create his own superior race (1941-1945). Idi Amin kills and exiles thousands for his dream -“an all black Uganda” (1972); Saddam Hussein uses poison gas on Kurd dissidents in his own country (1987-1989).
      We need to feel good about ourselves. Unfortunately, humans often do this by degrading others below them creating an artificial superiority for themselves.

 The Celts

    It wasn’t too long ago that the Celts from Germany and Western Europe invaded England. This was the first step of colonization by forcing their way into a new territory. The Celts then proceeded to take control of the political and economic activities of the English and put in place their dominate representatives for maintaining this control. In order to justify this aggressive behavior, the Celts created prejudicial stereotype impressions about the English. This helped create hate and prejudice against the English giving the Celts a sense of justification and superiority. The Celts gradually merged their culture with the English creating a new mixed society. This is an example of external colonialism.

The Romans

     The Romans then sent forces from Italy and invaded the Celt dominated England as well as many other territories. This was the first step of colonization by forcing their way into a new territory. The Romans then proceeded to take control of the political and economic activities of the Celts and put in place their dominate representatives for maintaining their control. In order to justify this aggressive behavior, the Romans created prejudicial stereotype impressions about the Celts. This helped create hate and prejudice against the Celts giving the Romans a sense of justification and superiority. The Romans gradually merged their culture with the Celts creating a new mixed society. This is another example of external colonialism.

 The Saxons and Angles

    The Saxons and Angles left Northern Germany and Denmark on a great adventure and invaded Roman-dominated England. This was the first step of colonization by forcing their way into a new territory. The Saxons and Angles then proceeded to take control of the political and economic activities of the Romans and put in place their dominate representatives for maintaining their control. In order to justify this aggressive behavior, the Saxons and Angles created prejudicial stereotype impressions about the Romans. This helped create hate and prejudice against the Romans giving the Saxons and Angeles a sense of justification and superiority. The Saxons and Angles gradually merged their culture with the Romans creating a new mixed society. This is another example of external colonialism.    

The Normans 

     Let’s continue as the Normans left Northern France lead by William the conqueror and invaded England. This was the first step of colonization by forcing their way into a new territory. The Normans then proceeded to take control of the political and economic activities of the Saxons and Angles and put in place their dominate representatives for maintaining their control. In order to justify this aggressive behavior, the Normans created prejudicial stereotype impressions about the Saxons and Angles. This helped create hate and prejudice against the Saxons and Angles giving the Normans a sense of justification and superiority. The Normans gradually merged their culture with the Saxons and Angles creating a new mixed society. We now have a Celt/English/Roman/Anglo-Saxon/Norman mixed culture. This is a continuous example of external colonialism.
     The repetitions in history are amazing. I suggest a requirement for anyone running for political office is to be well versed in history to keep from making the same mistakes of his predecessors, but that does not seem to be the case. 

The Anglo-Saxon Americans

     This combined Celt/English/Roman/Anglo-Saxon/Norman culture invaded America forming the original 13 colonies. For brevity, we will call them Anglo-Saxon Americans. They were also called WASPs (White Anglo-Saxon Protestants). This was the first step of colonization by forcing their way into a new territory. The dominant religion was now Protestant. The controlling race was now white. Laws ruled the land decided upon and written by those in control. The Anglo-Saxon core values were assimilated into the dominant culture and served as guideposts for others. Such values consisted of hard work, savings, individual recognition more than group, success measured by material wealth, Protestant based values and salvation beliefs as well as controlling temptations as a virtue. This is an example of external colonialism.

Native Americans

     The Anglo-Saxons managed the Native Americans by controlling the political and economic activities of the Native Americans and put in place their dominate representatives for maintaining their control. Tens of thousands Native Americans were forced into slavery helping insure the Anglo-Saxon economic superiority and prevent the Native Americans from obtaining resources. In order to justify this aggressive behavior, the Anglo-Saxons created prejudicial stereotype impressions about the Native Americans. Indians are “savages” and “stupid” and “the only good Indian is a dead Indian.” This helped create hate and prejudice against the Native Americans giving the Anglo-Saxons a sense of justification and superiority. The Anglo-Saxons gradually merged (forced) their culture with the Native Americans creating a new mixed society insisting that the Native Americans dress like the Anglo-Saxons and learn the Anglo-Saxon language. Over 100,000 Native American children were removed from their parents and shipped to boarding schools where their hair braids were cut off, they were forced to dress like white children, and were forbidden to speak their native tongue. Many Anglo-Saxon Americans were afraid if the Native Americans received valuable assets and rose to influence, that Anglo-Saxon Americans would gradually lose their cultural identity, access to their resources, and control over political influence. Tribes with self-governing laws, schools, and communities were a threat to the Colonist. The Cherokees adopted a written constitution that proclaimed the Cherokee nation had jurisdiction over its own territory which occupied a majority of Northwestern Georgia – sounds a little like our Declaration of Independence.  The Seminole tribe in Florida, the Creek Indians in Alabama and Georgia, and the Chickasaw and Choctaw in Mississippi were also considered a threat.  The government forced these five-civilized tribes to move to Oklahoma and guaranteed they could occupy Oklahoma, other than the panhandle, “…as long as grass shall grow and rivers run,”  a promise lasting until 1906 when apparently Oklahoma rivers stopped running. On this trip, known as the “Trail of Tears,” over 4,000 Native Americans died, mostly women and children, walking to Oklahoma in the winter months without any provisions (food, shelter, water). Native Americans were basically stripped of their culture.
     This is an example of internal colonialism. Eventually, a very few of the Native Americans were able to run for political office, to obtain a good education, and to have access to other valuable resources. Allowing the Native Americans to do these things has turned out to be beneficial for all.

The Blacks

     Anglo-Saxon Americans imported blacks as slaves in 1619. The Anglo-Saxon Americans controlled the black’s economic opportunities in order to insure cheap labor for large profits. By keeping blacks from owning land, from voting, and from obtaining a good education, and from access to valuable resources, the Anglo-Saxons insured that they would remained in control of the blacks keeping them from well-paying jobs, social privilege and status, and political position. In 1776, the Declaration of Independence stated that “…all men are created equal,” but blacks were then classified as “chattel,” something like cattle, and not considered human. Many Anglo-Saxon Americans were afraid if blacks received these assets and rose to influence, Anglo-Saxon Americans would gradually lose their cultural identity, access to their resources, and control over political influence. Schools were segregated and underfunded assuring blacks would receive an inadequate education, thus keeping blacks away from high-paying technical and prestigious jobs. 1964 was the first time blacks could vote without paying a poll tax.

     This is an example of internal colonialism. Eventually, however, the blacks were able to own land, to vote, to run for political office, to obtain a good education, and to have access to other valuable resources. Allowing the blacks to do these things has turned out to be beneficial for all.

The Irish

     1830-1860: Many Irish immigrated to America to find a better life. The Anglo-Saxon Americans controlled the Irish economic opportunities in order to insure cheap labor for large profits. Many Irish were employed as indentured servants exchanging their cost of passage for food and lodging under near “slave-like” conditions until their debt was considered paid. By keeping Irish from owning land, from voting, and from obtaining a good education, and from access to valuable resources, the Anglo-Saxons insured that they would remain in control of the Irish keeping them from well-paying jobs, social privilege and status, and political position. The Irish had a 21-year waiting period for citizenship, and many employment want ads specified, “No Irish Need Apply!” Because of the poor education offered Irish children, the Catholic Parochial School system gradually emerged as the Irish were forced to educate themselves. In order to justify their aggressive behavior against the Irish, the Anglo-Saxons created prejudicial stereotype impressions about the Irish calling them “barbarians” and “no nothings.” They were depicted as apelike drunks that were hostile and immoral and considered to be the subhuman “missing link” between the apes and Africans. The catch phrase “Americans shall Rule America” continued this prejudicial treatment against the Irish encouraging their continued mistreatment and suppression. Because the Irish were restricted to low-paying, labor-intensive jobs, they did not support the Underground Railroad movement where black slaves were fleeing the south. The Irish felt the blacks would work for less money and, therefore, threaten their job security.
     Many Anglo-Saxon Americans were afraid if Irish received valuable assets and rose to influence, Anglo-Saxon Americans would gradually lose their cultural identity, access to their resources, and control over political influence.
     This is an example of internal colonialism. Eventually, however, the Irish were able to run for political office, to obtain a good education, and to have access to other valuable resources. Allowing the Irish to do these things has turned out to be beneficial for all.

The Italians

     1860-1930: Many Italians immigrated to America to find a better life. The Anglo-Saxon Americans controlled the Italians economic opportunities in order to insure cheap labor for large profits. Like the Irish, many Italians were employed as indentured servants. By keeping Italians from owning land, from voting, and from obtaining a good education, and from access to valuable resources, the Anglo-Saxons insured that they would remain in control of the Italians keeping them from well-paying jobs, social privilege and status, and political position. Many Italian men were used in work gangs for the railroads and were shipped to various railroad projects throughout the country while the women worked in garment industry sweatshops. In order to justify their aggressive behavior against the Italians, the Anglo-Saxons created prejudicial stereotype impressions about the Italians calling them “gangsters,” “dagoes,” and “wops.” Italians were regarded as low class, stupid, and inferior and were assigned the menial work no one else wanted to do. Italian Americans were classified as non-Anglo and, next to blacks, were the second most likely group to be lynched. Many Anglo-Saxon Americans were afraid if Italians received valuable assets and rose to influence, Anglo-Saxon Americans would gradually lose their cultural identity, access to their resources, and control over political influence.
     This is an example of internal colonialism. Eventually, however, the Italians were able to run for political office, to obtain a good education, and to have access to other valuable resources. Allowing the Italians to do these things has turned out to be beneficial for all.

The Mexicans

     The Anglo-Saxon Americans invaded Mexico (now Texas, New Mexico, Nevada, and California). The Texas constitution was established and Texas was admitted to the union on December 29, 1845, while it was still part of Mexico. The Spanish-American war followed in 1846. This was the first step of colonization by forcing their way into a new territory. The Anglo-Saxons then proceeded to take control of the political and economic activities of the Mexicans and put in place their dominate representatives for maintaining this control. In order to justify this aggressive behavior, the Anglo-Saxons created prejudicial stereotype impressions about the Mexicans. This helped create hate and prejudice against the Mexicans giving the Anglo-Saxons a sense of justification and superiority Many Anglo-Saxon Americans were afraid if Mexicans received valuable assets and rose to influence, Anglo-Saxon Americans would gradually lose their cultural identity, access to their resources, and control over political influence.
     This is an example of internal colonialism. Eventually, however, some of the Mexicans were able to run for political office, to obtain a good education, and to have access to other valuable resources. Allowing the Mexicans to do these things has turned out to be beneficial for all.

The Chinese

    1851-1900: The Chinese immigrated into the United States. The Anglo-Saxon Americans controlled the Chinese economic opportunities in order to insure cheap labor for large profits. By keeping Chinese from owning land, from voting, from obtaining a good education, and from access to valuable resources, the Anglo-Saxons insured that they would remained in control of the Chinese keeping them from well-paying jobs, social privilege and status, and political position. Many Chinese were used to build the railroad out west under horrible “slave-like” conditions. In order to justify their aggressive behavior against the Chinese, the Anglo-Saxons created prejudicial stereotype impressions about the Chinese calling them “coolies” and “slant-eyes.” The depression of 1873 was blamed on the Chinese being willing to work for substandard wages, thus taking away the Anglo-Saxon jobs. California citizens complained that Chinese workers sent back to their families in China over $90,000 per day causing an economic catastrophe in California. Many Anglo-Saxon Americans were afraid if Chinese received these assets and rose to influence, Anglo-Saxon Americans would gradually lose their cultural identity, access to their resources, and control over political influence.
     This is an example of internal colonialism. Eventually, however, the Chinese were able to own land, to vote, to run for political office, to obtain a good education, and to have access to other valuable resources. Allowing the Chinese to do these things has turned out to be beneficial for all.

The Latinos

     In 2010, the dominant community of Anglo-Saxon Americans has 11-million Latino immigrants throughout America. The Anglo-Saxon Americans control the Latino immigrant’s economic opportunities in order to insure cheap labor for large profits. By keeping the illegal Latino immigrants from owning land, from voting, from obtaining a good education, and from access to valuable resources, the Anglo-Saxons insured that they would remain in control of the Latino immigrant’s keeping them from well-paying jobs, social privilege, and political position. In order to justify their aggressive behavior against the Latinos, the Anglo-Saxons created prejudicial stereotype impressions about the Latinos calling them wetbacks and illegals. Latinos are often regarded as low class and uneducated and are given the menial work no one else wants to do. Many Latino immigrants are used to harvest crops and perform unpleasant manufacturing jobs. Many Anglo-Saxon Americans are afraid if Latino immigrant’s receive valuable assets and rise to influence, Anglo-Saxon Americans would gradually lose their cultural identity (English as a primary language next to Spanish), access to their resources (Anglo-Americans are complaining that Latinos are not paying taxes yet we are sending their children to school and paying for their medical expenses), and control over political influence. Many Anglo-Saxons believe America is for Americans and insist the Latinos learn English and adopt the American culture. Many poor blacks working menial, labor-intensive jobs are afraid the Latinos will work for even less money and threaten these black’s job security.
    This is an example of internal colonialism. Eventually, however, the Latino immigrants might gain access to valuable resources. Perhaps the Anglo-Americans might learn to speak another language. If all this happens, well, this might turn out to be beneficial for all.

Breaking the original Anglo-Saxon colonization dominance

     Has the United States economy, politics, and culture been dominated by our Anglo-Saxon founders? The United States is the land of opportunity. It is called the “melting pot” of many cultures, where anyone - if they work hard enough - can become president. The first forty-three presidents of the United States have been white, male, and Protestant other than John F. Kennedy who was white, male, and Catholic. President Barack Obama breaks this trend of the original Anglo-Saxon colonization dominance in the United States. This is an extremely significant occurrence. Whether or not Obama is judged as a good or bad president is not the issue, but instead that a 235-year old, stereotypical chain of culture in the United States leadership has been broken. Will this open the gates for improved acceptance of diversity and better understanding? Perhaps our next president will be a woman or a Jew or a Latino. Only time will tell.

Source: American Ethnicity – The Dynamics and Consequences of Discrimination Aguirre, Adalberto and Turner, Jonathan McGraw Hill Publishing 5th Edition 2007 New York, NY

THE SEVEN STEPS IN COLONIZATION*

  1. Colonization occurs when a more powerful group of people colonizes a less powerful group by forcing their way into the new territory and gradually taking control of the political and economic activities of the weaker group.
  2. Gradually the dominate group alters or destroys the weaker group’s culture and their social organizations as well as having dominate representatives present for maintaining this control.
  3. In order to justify this aggressive behavior, the dominant group creates prejudicial stereotype beliefs about the weaker group. (All Muslims are terrorists, all blacks are stupid and lazy, all Italians are connected to the mob, Jews are cheap and miserly, the only good Indian is a dead Indian, all Native Americans are alcoholics, all the Irish are drunks, the Latinos are bleeding our economic society, Irish are barbarians, they are apelike drunks that were hostile and immoral and considered to be the subhuman “missing link” between the apes and Africans.
  4. Laws or policies are created by the dominant group restricting the dominated group’s abilities to advance. (The Irish may not own land, the Italians may not enter politics, the Chinese may not vote, Native Americans must leave their land, the Mexicans are too stupid to govern themselves so God has empowered us to take over their land and guide them, farmworkers may not organize and their wages are not regulated.)
  5. The dominant group controls the social, political, educational, and economic activities of a less-powerful group within the new colony; the dominant group maintains power and protects their assets needed for survival. By controlling the ability for the weaker group to become educated, to obtain good employment, to elevate socially, and to gain political control, the dominant group assures it will remain on top with little competition. (Italians may not become citizens for twenty-one years, blacks are not allowed to vote, Jews cannot join our country clubs, the Irish may not run for political office, the blacks may not move into our neighborhood for they lower our property values, HELP WANTED - Irish need not apply, blacks may only do menial jobs, only whites may attend private schools.)
  6. The dominant group needs cheap labor to harvest its crops and manufacture its products so large profits can be realized. Therefore, it would be in the best interest of the dominant group to keep the weaker group uneducated, unable to run for political office, unable to elect their representatives into managerial positions, and unable to socially gain community status. (blacks were kept working in the fields, the Chinese were used as slave labor building our railroads, Latinos are currently harvesting our crops and doing undesirable factory jobs, the picking of oranges and tomatoes in Immokalee, Florida.)
  7. If any weaker group threatens the dominate group’s security, or occupies land desired by the dominant group, or threatens the dominant groups culture, resources, or economy; the dominant group will instinctually challenge or insult the weaker group, then negotiates or barter with the weaker group, and if unsuccessful, display their aggression and dominance by threatening or attacking the weaker group. (The Sioux takeover at wounded knee, The Cherokee Trail-of-tears march to Oklahoma, the Kurds villages attacked by Sadam Hussain, Native Americans and the early United States Government, when Mexico occupied the land of the future Texas, Arizona, and California; the colonization of the African Congo by Belgium, the formation of the seven original colonies in Eastern North America, and the colonization of India by Great Brittan.


**************************************************************

Hiram Weekend College
Diversity through Debate
TEST ONE - SUMMER 2016 - TRI-C
Take-Home Test One – Chapters 1, 2, 3 - American Ethnicity

Please print this test, answer each question, and bring the completed test to class on September 21. For essay questions, use the number of words you feel best answers the question based on the material you have been exposed to both from the text and in class. Use extra sheets if necessary.

Name _________________________________________________ possible 100 points

SECTION ONE:  Chapter One: 3 points each - total 30 points. Matching, place the letter of the definition that best matches the term in the numbered questions 1 through 10.

1.___Ethnicity

2.___ Ethnic group or ethnic subpopulation

3.___ Minority group or subordinate group

4.___ Ethnic discrimination

5.___Reserve Discrimination

6.  ___ Segregation

7.  ___ Expulsion

8.  ___ Genocide and ethnic cleansing

9.  ___ Selective inclusion

10.___ Ethnic prejudice

NOTE:  YOU HAVE ONE MORE ANSWER THAN QUESTIONS: 11 answers, 10 questions, read carefully.

(A) A subpopulation of individuals who are labeled and categorized by the general population and, often, by the members of the group itself as being a particular type of ethnicity.

(B) The process by which the members of a more powerful and dominant ethnic subpopulation deny the members of another, less powerful and subordinate ethnic population full access to valued resources – jobs, income, education, health, prestige, power, or anything that society values.

(C) The process of allowing members of ethnic subpopulations into certain positions while at the same time excluding them from other positions. A subpopulation’s shared historical experiences as well as unique organizational, behavioral, and cultural characteristics

(D) A subpopulation’s shared historical experiences as well as unique organizational, behavioral, and cultural characteristics

(E) Spatially isolating members of an ethnic subpopulation in areas where they cannot have the same access to valued resources as do people who are not isolated.

 (F) When a particular ethnic subpopulation is forced to relocate to a selected area.

(G) A result of programs designed to overcome the effects of past discrimination against members of a subordinate population where some members of the dominate subpopulation are denied equal access to valued resources.

(H) The less powerful ethnic subpopulation - the subordinate group - that is subjected to the more powerful ethnic subpopulation’s power to discriminate.

(I) A set of beliefs and stereotypes about designated subpopulations that share certain identifying characteristics – biological, behavioral, organizational, cultural – or are at least perceived to share these characteristics.

(J) When members of an ethnic subpopulation are killed or potentially an entire ethnic group is exterminated.

(K) A group of people who, because of their physical or cultural characteristics, are singled out from others in society in which they live for differential and unequal treatment and who therefore regard themselves as objects of collective discrimination.

SECTION TWO:  Chapter One: 3 points each, total 18 points. Multiple Choice & TRUE & FALSE

11. Which of the following is a type of discrimination?

(a) genocide (b) ethnic cleansing (c) expulsion (d) segregation (e) exclusion (f) selective inclusion (g) abusive practices (h) all of the above

12. What process is the most important force sustaining ethnicity, that is, the central process underlying ethnic problems in today’s society?

(a) Discrimination  (b) Expulsion (c) Segregation (d) Stratification

13. What is NOT an example of self-segregation?

(a) China Town  (b) Little Italy  (c) A black Muslim community (d) a mandatory American Indian reservation

14. What is NOT an example of expulsion?

(a) Japanese residents in American being sent to camps after the bombing of Pearl Harbor

(b) the 1934 President Jackson Indian Relocation Act required the Seminole, Choctaw, Cherokee, Creek, and Chickasaw Indian tribes to migrate on foot 1200 miles to Oklahoma. They were escorted by the U.S. Calvary in the middle of winter and given no food or clothing. 4000 died in route, mostly the elderly, women, and children.

(c) China Town 

(d) In 1975, 3 million people were forced out of the cities of Cambodia to perform slave labor in the country sides as part of the “Rural Social Reform.” Over 1 million people died or were killed in this process

(e) In South Africa, the Apartheid government forbid any blacks to live in Cape Town and required them to leave the city and fend for themselves in the bush   

15. People from China, Japan, Vietnam, Korea, Philippines, and Cambodia are all from extremely different cultures with entirely different histories and customs. But they have all been linked into one subgroup (Aisan) because their eye fold is different from others.

Similarly, the American Indian population such as Cherokee, Black Foot, Iroquois, Sioux, Apache, Seminole, Choctaw, and Navajo are also from extremely different cultures with entirely different histories and customs, yet they have also been linked into a new subgroup because of their similar role in our nation’s history - Native American. Linking unrelated groups of people into a new ethnic subgroup based on prejudice is called: Circle One Answer

(a) ethnogenesis (b) passive acceptance (c) assimilation (d) ethnic stratification

16.    TRUE  FALSE  Institutionalized discrimination produces ethnic stratification. When members of a subordinate ethnic subpopulation receive only certain types and levels of valued resources, it becomes possible to establish their location on the social hierarchies of society. On the basis of this location, the distinctiveness of an ethnic group is retained, thereby making it a target of further prejudices and discrimination.

SECTION THREE: Chapter Two: Matching Section and Short Answer – 4 points each, Possible 28 points:

Match the letter (a through g) from the definitions in the blank space adjacent the terms (1 through 7) that properly identifies each definition’s  meaning.

17)       TERMS

1)      Behavior-receptional assimilation              ____

2)      Attitude-receptional assimilation                ____

3)      Structural assimilation                               ____

4)      Identification assimilation                          ____

5)      Cultural assimilation                                  ____

6)      Civic assimilation                                      ____

7)      Assimilation Theories                                ____

DEFINITIONS

a.         the absence of intentional discrimination by dominant ethnic groups against subordinate ethnic groupsb.      when migrant ethnic groups become members of the primary groups within dominant-ethnic subpopulations – their families, close friends, cliques within clubs, and groups and organizations.

c.     the process by which members of an ethnic population become part of the mainstream of a society.

d.      the reduction of conflict between ethnic groups over basic values and access to the political arena.

e.       when individuals no longer see themselves as distinctive and, like members of dominant groups, stake their personal identities to participation and success in the mainstream institutions of society.

f.       the lack of prejudicial attitudes and stereotyping on the part of both the dominant and migrant ethnic groups.

g.       when values, beliefs, dogmas, ideologies, language and other systems and symbols of the dominant culture are adopted.

18) SECTION FOUR-FILL IN THE BLANK - 12 points - Chapter 3 Anglo-Saxon traditions and institutional structures came from many assimilated cultures in England resulting from a mixing pot of many conquering powers. The Celts, Romans, and Normans all invaded and conquered inhabitants of England, each eventually assimilating, resulting in an Anglo-Saxon culture. This culture consisted of:

Language: English

Predominant skin color: White

Predominant religion: Protestant
Work ethic: Work hard and the individual can get ahead

Basic Values:
1. _________________________________________
2. _________________________________________
3 __________________________________________
4. _________________________________________


Legal Tenets adopted from eighteenth-century French philosophies:
1. __________________________________________________________________________
2. __________________________________________________________________________
3. __________________________________________________________________________
4. __________________________________________________________________________

Economic Institutions – emphasis placed on:

1. _________________________________________
2. _________________________________________
3 __________________________________________
 
Political Institutions: encouraged discrimination against ethnic groups to provide inexpensive laborer....in the name of territorial expansion, industrial and commercial development, private property rights and states’ rights.

Educational Institutions: Anglo-Saxon Eurocentric  = core values of curriculum

SECTION FIVE - Essay Questions:

19) 12 points Under the Unified Theory of Ethnic Relations, what is meant by “…a sense of threat.” And how does it work?  Not less than 250 words. Use extra sheets if necessary.

**********************************************************************

TEST TWO  - Summer 2016 - TRI-C

     Above is the Essay "A Painful Look at Colonization." Read it carefully. Write a paper addressing the following topics: Because immigration history is repeating itself in this country, do you think it would be beneficial for politicians to have some knowledge of colonization history before taking office? Why or why not? President Obama used his executive privilege to pass an Executive Order on immigration because Republicans have refused to vote on a similar bill. A link to an article and video is below. Do you feel this Executive Order will change some of the repeated prejudices presented in "A Painful Look at Colonization."? How will it change them?  Why will it change them?  Both questions together must not total less than 750 words combined.
http://www.bing.com/news/search?q=Obama's+Immigration+Executive+Order&qpvt=Obama%27s+immigration+executive+order&FORM=NWRFSH

TEST TWO B - SAMPLE

Take-home quiz 2 issued - American Ethnicity – quiz on African Americans. (The chapter number on African Americans varies with your text addition). At the back of the Chapter there are "Points for Debate." Pick one of them and write a paper arguing for, against, or otherwise using the material in the chapter as support.

******************************************************************

Diversity through Debate - Hiram College
Final Examination – Take home
Final Exam Issued July 1 due July 8. 2016

 In this Diversity through Debate class we talked about human behavior, instinct, discrimination, and prejudice. We have studied the history of our country’s discrimination including such philosophies as stratification, assimilation, ethnogenesis, ecology theories, pluralism theories and manifest destiny. We’ve explored the hardships suffered by the blacks, Native Americans, Chinese, Irish, and Italians as they evolved through assimilation in this country. Exploring diversity through the mentally ill and the handicapped did not escape our attention either. Man’s inhumanity to man take hundreds of forms.

In the United States, we are currently undergoing a thorough examination of how our military treats women. Equal pay for women and men doing the same job was one of our military’s claims to modernization, yet repeated sexual abuse, rape and protecting the victims of such crimes is currently casting a shadow over our military’s integrity. At Harvard University, the customary issued consequences for cheating on a test is far greater than for rape.

Why is it that females must fight for the right to be equal, respected, and treated with dignity? More females have been discriminated to death in the past fifty years than all the deaths suffered by all participants in all wars in all countries of the world in the past 100 years comprising the 20th century – 1900-1999. Now, today, there approximately 100 million women missing from the earth’s current population.

Just like the Irish, blacks, Chinese, and Native Americans; just like the handicapped and mentally ill; just like the poor and people of different religions, females are a part of everyone’s diversity. They make up approximately half of the human population.  Why are they a target of such intense discrimination?

Through your independent and cited research, write a minimum of a 1000-word, double-spaced, printed essay on what positive steps have been taken in the past five years in the United States toward female equality and appreciating the female’s diversity as an asset rather than something to degrade. What problems in this area will be the most difficult to change? What are the key points of our current military’s investigation into sexual abuse among their ranks? Can you find examples of where females are moving ahead of males, such as presently more females are graduating from college than males? Do you have any resolution for this problem? Do you have a reason why you think it exists?

Cutting-and-pasting from any resource will result in a failing grade. Don't even think about taking that chance! Please use your own words! Give credit where you obtained your information. No writing assignment may contain more than 20% of the required word count from quotes.

Diversity through Debate
Final Exam Sample #2

Hiram College
Team Taught WEC Interdisciplinary
 

Name ___________________________________________________PRINT

There are two essay questions on this final. Each is to be not less than 750 words. You may use your texts or other sources (documented) to obtain the necessary information to answers each question. Write this exam in your own words. Give credit for your sources. Any copying or cutting and pasting from other articles or source without quotations and giving proper credit will result in an "F."

Question I. The Indian Reorganization Act of 1934, the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975, and the Tribally Controlled Community College Assistance Act of 1978 were intended to improve life and the future for Native Americans. Other organizations like the National Congress of American Indians and the American Indian Movement are also based on positive intentions. Have these organizations been successful in reaching their goals? Why or why not? What successes have they realized? What problems have they faced or what circumstances have possibly rendered their progress slower than anticipated? You may consider some of the below terms in developing an answer. Use our text book, but also other sources for information (list in paper’s bibliography).

Colonization
Discrimination
Prejudice
Stratification
Assimilation
Split-Class/Market
Caste System
Ethnogenesis
Ecology Theories
Pluralism Theories
Manifest Destiny

Question II. Judging others is at the root of prejudice and discrimination. Write a paper about the worst president you feel the United States ever had. The first 250 words are to describe why you think he was the worst president (based on facts in office); the remaining 500 words are to describe all the good things he accomplished while in office.

Bring this Final Exam to the last class in in a 7 week format, or email to the assigned address if you are in the Three-Week format. Have it printed, double spaced, and STAPLED together. Loose or paper-clipped exams will not be accepted. Please have the pages numbered. Please have your name, date, course title, and the words FINAL EXAM written on the first page especially if you are emailing the exam.

********************************************************

Diversity through Debate
Final Exam Sample #3
Hiram College
Final Examination – Take home

Name __________________________________________PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME

There are two essay questions on this final exam. You may use your texts or other sources (documented) to obtain the necessary information to answers each question. Each essay answer must be no less than 750 words double spaced.

Question I.  Select at least three topics from Column A, three topics from Column B, and one or more related ethnic groups from Column C and,  in no less than 750 words, write how all of your selections relate to the problems and prejudices of internal or external colonization.

Example:    A. Indian Removal Act of 1830, Indian Reorganization Act of 1936, Major Crimes Act
                             of   1885                  
                       
B. Assimilation, Discrimination, Manifest Destiny
                        C. Native American

Column A – Legal Discrimination                          Column B           Column C

The Naturalization Act of 1790 – blacks
Jim Crow Laws – blacks
Civil Rights Act of 1875 - blacks
Keyes v. Denver School District No.1 – 1973 – blacks
Plessy v. Ferguson 1896 – blacks
Civil Rights Acts of 1964 and 1968 – blacks
Weber v. Kaiser Aluminum 1979 – blacks
Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 - Chinese
National Origins Acts 1924 - Japanese
Immigration Act of 1917 – Japanese & Asians
Korematsu v. United States 1944 - Japanese
Japanese American Evacuation Claims Act 1948 – Japanese
Immigration Act of 1924 – European immigrants
Immigration Act of 1965 – established visa system
Blue laws / papist / Catholic School System
Illegal Immigration Reform & Responsibility Act 1996
Indian Removal Act of 1830 – Native Americans
Major Crimes Act 1885 – Native Americans
Indian Reorganization Act of 1936 – Native Americans
Indian Claims Commission Act of 1946 – Native Americans
Relocation Act of 1944 and 1956 – Native Americans
Immigration Reform/Control Act of 1986 – employers hiring


Discrimination
     Political
     Economic
     Educational
     Housing
     Social
Prejudice
Stratification
Assimilation
Split-Class/Market
Caste System
Ethnogenesis
Ecology Theories
Pluralism Theories
Biological Theories
Manifest Destiny
Affirmative Action

Anglo-Saxon
Blacks
Native Americans
Asians
Mexicans
Latinos
Japanese
Europeans
     Irish 
     Italians

Question II.  Below are listed three topics. Write a paper explaining the differences (not the similarities) between these subjects listing the reasons, fears, intentions, problems, and effectiveness of their outcomes.

(1)     Executive Order 9066 – Japanese Internment Camps 1942, (2) the Patriot Act 2001, and (3) Guantanamo Bay Cuba – Detained Suspected Terrorist Prisoners

EXTRA CREDIT - Given here as a sample only

Extra Credit: (pick one) Minimum 750 words (worth up to 5 points of your total grade based on quality and comprehensiveness).

(1) Write a paper describing similarities between Willie Lynch and Jim Crow

(2) Write a paper about the worst president you feel the United States ever had. The first 250 words are to describe why you think he was the worst president; the remaining 500 words are to describe all the good things he accomplished while in office.

(4) Go to the web site describing the world's 10 worst dictators: http://www.parade.com/articles/editions/2006/edition_01-22-2006/Dictators  Research one of these dictators describing several of the good and beneficial things he/she has accomplished while in office.

(5) On the top of this page there is a link to an article entitled "Prisoner Privatization Concerns." Write a paper comparing prison labor to slave labor and cheap immigrant labor. Are the rich still controlling the poor or disadvantaged keeping them in menial labor jobs to increase profits? Is this exploitation? Is this taking advantage of the disadvantaged for personal gain? Is this practice OK because it returns jobs to the U.S. that were lost to overseas cheap labor?

(5)  Write a paper about one of the following world heroes of peace describing some of the unfortunate things he/she did during his/her life that harmed or caused great distress for many people.

  1. Mahatma Gandhi

  2. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

  3. Abraham Lincoln

  4. Nelson Mandela

  5. Florence Nightingale

  6. Eleanor Roosevelt

  7. Mother Teresa

  8. Desmond Mpilo Tutu

  9. Booker T. Washington

Modified Parliamentary Debate  -- Rules and Guidelines

Parliamentary debate is now the most widely practiced type of informal classroom debating. Based loosely on the deliberative discussion of the British House of Commons, the basic structure of parliamentary debates are as follows:

General Format

The specific formats, rules and conventions of parliamentary debating vary in different nations and leagues. One of the virtues of parliamentary debate is its flexibility.  Speaking times, number of speakers, judging and other elements of the debate format may be altered to accommodate particular needs and purpose.

Specific Format:

  1. Preparation - The student and his/her assigned debate group is expected to read each assignment and be prepared for the debate before class. Other areas of research should be used in addition to the class text. A bibliography of this research must be turned in after each debate by each team.
     
  2. The participants and their groups are to analyze the issue and outline the major arguments. They ask themselves:  What does the issue mean? What important tissues are raised? How may it be affirmed or denied? What examples and events are relevant to its discussion? The answers to these and other questions will serve as the foundation for the case and prepare the opposing side for its refutation. During preparation time, you are allowed to use dictionaries, texts and other prepared materials.

B.        Speakers

The primary speaker(s) for each group should use some of the preparation time to organize the main issues of the case in a logically complete and persuasive format to convey the best possible impression of the case. The speaker(s) therefore uses preparation time to arrange the essential elements of the issue into a brief outline. All preparation needs to be accomplished before coming to class; therefore, planned communication between group members before class is necessary.

All material for the First Proposition and Opposition speakers must be taken from the issues assigned in the text Taking Sides

C.        First proposition and opposition constructive speech

The first speaker establishes the framework for the issue and establishes a logically complete case for the proposition. This involves an expository presentation in which the speaker may define any ambiguous terms, offer a history of the issue or nature of the controversy, and disclose any limitations for the discussion. After such preliminaries, the speaker should state and support the main points of the issue.

            6 MINUTES each

D.        Second proposition and opposition constructive speech   - 6 MINUTES

All material for the Second Proposition and Opposition speakers must be taken from supporting resources other than the text Taking Sides. Books, magazine articles, newspapers, the Internet and other sources may be used and a complete bibliography for this material must be turned in after each debate.

E.         Rebuttals

Most good debates are won or lost in rebuttals. The rebuttals are the summary speeches for each side of the debate, the last opportunity each side will have to explain why they should win. Rebuttals are a final opportunity to contrast the major positions and philosophies of the proposition and opposition. Skilled rebuttalists in parliamentary debate do not attempt to cover every minute issue that has been discussed in debate, but rather to deal in depth with those issues that will have substantial bearing on the decision to uphold or defeat the motion. Rebuttalists should paint the “big picture” of the round, sorting out the decisive issues from those that are less important.

New arguments may not be introduced in rebuttal. Arguments presented in the rebuttal must have a foundation in the constructive speeches. The proposition rebuttalists is entitled to answer new arguments made in the second opposition speech, because the final rebuttal is the first opportunity that the proposition team has to refute these issues.

The opposition has the first rebuttal speech.  The opposition rebuttalist should carry through important issues form the constructive speeches, illustrating the significant dimensions of each issue in qualitative or quantitative terms. The opposition should generally avoid “putting all eggs in one basket” by offering several independent reasons to support their groups view and/or reject the alternative view.

5 MINUTES

The proposition has the final speech in the debate. This speech should summarize the entire debate from the perspective of the proposition, focusing the discussion on a group of powerfully unified ideas. The final rebuttalists should extend the important arguments from the constructives and offer multiple independent proofs or facts about the issue.

                5 MINUTES

F.             Points of Information

At the end of each debate, time will be allotted for audience members to ask questions, cross examine, or seek clarification from either the opposition or proposition. Students in the audiance during debates should be preparuing questiuoins and comments for this audience parttpation section of each debate.  Individuals are allotted 1 minute to make a point of order with the respondent being allowed a maximum of 2 minutes to respond.

A point of information is addressed in the following manner:  The person making the point rises form his or her seat saying “Point of information, Roger….”.

CHART ONE - PROCEDURE RECAP OF DEBATE PROCEDURES: total time = 45 minutes

THE COLOR BLUE - XXXXX - Proposition or YES Group
THE COLOR RUST - XXXXX = Rebuttal or NO Group

  Speaker
Order
Event

Time Allowed
in Minutes

 
A   Preparation  Be prepared Entire group - done before class
B First 1st Proposition Constructive Speech     6 YES Group - sources from the text Taking Sides
C Second 1st Opposition Constructive Speech   6 NO Group - sources from the text Taking Sides 
D Third 2nd Proposition Constructive Speech  6 YES Group - sources other than Taking Sides
E Fourth 2nd Opposition Constructive Speech  6 NO Group - sources other than Taking Sides
F Fifth Opposition Rebuttal 5 NO Group
G Sixth Proposition Rebuttal 5 YES Group
H   Points of Information     11 Entire class
       

(Maximum 1 minute question, maximum 2 minute response)

    Total time  

 45 Minutes

 
 

CHART TWO - Group's Individual Assignments For Each of Up To Seven Debates - Four Groups, 3 to 4 people in each group

                 
Debate
Class
Debate Member Number of
First
Speaker in Group
Member Number of
Second
Speaker in
Group
Member Number of Rebuttal Speaker

Submits one page decision on debate winner

Substitute in case of absence
-
Bibliography
Group  

2015

   1st  Constructive

2nd Constructive

  (at next class) Timer    
                 
  One 1 2  3 4   1 & 2  
  Two 1 2  3 4   3 & 4  
  Three 3  4 2  1   1 & 2  
  Four 3  4 2  1   3 & 4  
  Five 2  1 4  3   1 & 2  
  Six 2  1 4   3   3 & 4  
  Seven              

                        Example: There are 3 to 4  people in each group. The groups are numbered one through four. On Debate Number 1,

   

       person 1 gives the First Constructive, person 2 the Second Constructive, person 3 the Rebuttal, and
       person 4 submits a one-page decision on who won the debate due the next class. 
       During subsequent debates each team member fills a different position as depicted.

 

 

 

 

 

CHART 2A - Group's Individual Assignments For Each of Up To Seven Debates - Two Groups, 3 people in each group

                 
Debate
Class
Debate Member Number of
First
Speaker in Group
Member Number of
Second
Speaker in
Group
Member Number of Rebuttal Speaker

Submits one page decision on debate winner

Substitute in case of absence
-
Bibliography
Group  

2016

   1st  Constructive

2nd Constructive

  (at next class) Timer    
                 
  One 1 2  3     1 & 2  
  Two 2 3 1     1 & 2  
  Three 3 1 2     1 & 2  
  Four 1 2 3     1 & 2  
  Five 2 3 1     1 & 2  
  Six 3  1 2     1 & 2  
                 

 

CHART THREE - Group's Individual Assignments For Each of Up To Seven Debates - 2 groups, 4 to 5 people in each group

Group 1
                    
Debate
Class
Debate Member Number of
First
Speaker in Group
Member Number of
Second
Speaker in
Group
Member Number of Rebuttal Speaker

Submits one page decision on debate winner

Substitute in case of absence
-
Bibliography
  Group  

2015

   1st  Constructive

2nd Constructive

  (at next class) Timer      
                   
  One 1 2  3 4 5   1  
  Two 5 1 2  3 4   1  
  Three 4 5  1 2 3   1  
  Four 3  4 5 1 2   1  
  Five 2  3 4 5 1   1  
  Six 1  2 3 4 5   1  
  Seven 5 1 2 3 4   1  

Group 2
                   
Debate
Class
Debate Member Number of
First
Speaker in Group
Member Number of
Second
Speaker in
Group
Member Number of Rebuttal Speaker

Submits one page decision on debate winner

Substitute in case of absence
-
Bibliography
Substitute Group  

2015

   1st  Constructive

2nd Constructive

  (at next class) Timer      
                   
  One 1 2  3 4 5        6        2  
  Two 6 5 1  2 3 4 2  
  Three 4 6  5 1 2 3 2  
  Four 3  4 6 5  1 2 2  
  Five 2  3 4 6 5 1  2  
  Six 1  2 3 4 6 5 2  
  Seven 5 1 2 3 4 6 2  

   

       Example: There are 6  people in each group. The groups are numbered one through two.
       On Debate Number 1,
person 1 gives the First Constructive, person 2 the Second Constructive, person 3 the Rebuttal, person
       number 4 submits a one-page decision on who won the debate due the next class, person number 5 is the timer. 
       The sixth person fills in for anyone abscent. During subsequent debates each team member fills a
        different position as depicted.